Acupuncture Research Library
Sources cited on our currently published condition pages, summarized in plain language and linked to the original publications.
4 Studies Indexed
The Research Behind Our Care
This library collects the sources cited on condition pages that have completed the site’s content-review workflow. Each entry links to its original publication and includes a concise plain-language summary.
Evidence quality and relevance vary by study. These summaries are educational, do not independently validate a paper’s conclusions, and should not replace medical advice.
Published-source library · Updated
Cochrane Review
Cochrane Systematic Review — Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Compared with no treatment, acupuncture produced clinically relevant pain relief (moderate-certainty evidence), and compared with usual care it improved function and quality of life. Differences versus sham acupuncture were smaller and fell below the review’s threshold for clinical importance.
Mu J, et al. Acupuncture for chronic nonspecific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;12:CD013814. View on PubMed →
Meta-Analysis
Acupuncture for Chronic Pain — 39 trials, 20,827 patients
Across 39 high-quality randomized trials, acupuncture was superior to both sham acupuncture and no-acupuncture controls for chronic back and neck pain. Treatment effects persisted over time and could not be explained by placebo alone.
Vickers AJ, et al. Acupuncture for Chronic Pain: Update of an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2018;19(5):455-474. View on PubMed →
Clinical Guideline
American College of Physicians — Low Back Pain Guideline
The ACP recommends acupuncture as a first-line, non-drug treatment for chronic low back pain — to be tried before medication — and as a treatment option for acute low back pain.
Qaseem A, et al. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):514-530. View on PubMed →
Randomized Trial
GERAC Trial — 1,162 patients, one of the largest back-pain RCTs
After 6 months, 47.6% of acupuncture patients met the response criteria versus 27.4% receiving guideline-based conventional care (medication, physical therapy, and exercise) — nearly double the response rate.
Haake M, et al. German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for Chronic Low Back Pain. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(17):1892-1898. View on PubMed →
These summaries are educational and describe published research; they are not medical advice and not a guarantee of individual results. This library grows as we publish new condition pages.
Curious What the Evidence Means for You?
Book an appointment and we’ll walk through it together.